This post was published 8 years ago

There's a chance things are out of date or no longer reflect my views today

How to: flexible squares with CSS

How do you maintain a perfect square shape with a responsive layout? The solution appears simple; the only issue is your content. Which if you want to maintain a square shape it should be able to accommodate the content. I’ll show you how to do it in with this quick tip.

4,034 views

How to: flexible squares with CSS (featured image)

How do you maintain a perfect square shape with a responsive layout? The solution appears simple; the only issue is your content. Which if you want to maintain a square shape it should be able to accommodate the content. I’ll show you how to do it in with this quick tip.

The problem

So you have a row of items that you want to maintain a 1:1 ratio. Then as you resize the screen you want those to retain that ratio and adjust at certain breakpoints and continue to with the square shape.

The solution for elements without container

To solve this problem we need to use a percentage padding on the bottom. The value of the padding-bottom must be equal to the width. So if I have a row with four items, that means the padding would need to be 25%.

HTML

Your HTML may look something like this.

<div class=“row”>
  <div class=“square”>
  </div>
  <div class=“square”>
  </div>
  <div class=“square”>
  </div>
  <div class=“square”>
  </div>
</div>

CSS required

The basic CSS requires the expected width and padding-bottom. The height is for security, in making sure you start from 0.

.square {
  width: 25%;
  height: 0;
  padding-bottom: 25%; }

The solution for working with grids

If your items are within grid layout, understandably so, this affects the padding-bottom. In this case, it’s just 100% for all.

HTML

Your HTML may look something like this.

<div class=“grid”>
  <div class=“grid-cell grid-25”>
    <div class=“square”></div>
  </div>
  <div class=“grid-cell grid-25”>
    <div class=“square”></div>
  </div>
  <div class=“grid-cell grid-25”>
    <div class=“square”></div>
  </div>
  <div class=“grid-cell grid-25”>
    <div class=“square”></div>
  </div>
</div>

CSS required

Essentially the same aside from our values. Depending on your element, it’s possible the width is redundant if it’s a block level element.

.square {
  width: 100%;
  height: 0;
  padding-bottom: 100%; }

Borders can affect dimensions

As it’s common practice having box-sizing set to border-box, adding a border to the outermost element will change the dimensions. This is something to be aware of, and you will need to make adjustments.

An option is to use calc() and subtract the border from the width and padding-bottom. Using box-sizing: content-box, will remove this issue but with that, you create another problem.

Again the solution

See the Pen Flexible squares by Steve (@stevemckinney) on CodePen.

View on Github